Scaling up processes with full-wave Barbell horns leads to an increase in liquid processing capacity approximately proportional to (Dfbh/Dch)^2, where Dfbh and Dch are the FBH (after the scale-up) and CH (before the scale-up) output tip diameters, respectively. For example, if conventional ultrasonic horn has an output tip diameter of 13 mm and the full-wave Barbell horn operating at the same amplitude has an output tip diameter of 65 mm, the productivity-rate increase factor after the scale-up will be 25.
HBH devices generate both downward and upward liquid streaming, which helps mixing the liquids inside a batch or flow-through reactor. HBH devices are smaller than FBH devices, making it possible to design more compact systems. The cumulative cavitation area produced by these horns is very large (approximately double of that produced by an FBH). Scaling up processes with half-wave Barbell horns leads to an increase in liquid processing capacity approximately proportional to 2(Dhbh/Dch)^2, where Dhbh and Dch are the HBH (after the scale-up) and CH (before the scale-up) output tip diameters, respectively. For example, if conventional ultrasonic horn has an output tip diameter of 13 mm and the half-wave Barbell horn operating at the same amplitude has an output tip diameter of 65 mm, the productivity-rate increase factor after the scale-up will be approximately 50.
These horns produce two major cavitation zones (under/inside and above the output section) ensuring that no liquid is able to bypass the active treatment zone as it flows through the reactor chamber. The lower zone experiences an additional effect of cavitation focusing, due to concentric expansion-contraction which occurs simultaneously with the longitudinal motion of the output section. HBHO devices generate both downward and upward liquid streaming, which helps mixing the liquids inside a batch or flow-through reactor. Scaling up processes with HBHO devices leads to an increase in liquid processing capacity, which depends on the shape and size of the hollow section and is greater than 2(Dhbho/Dch)^2, where Dhbho and Dch are the HBHO (after the scale-up) and CH (before the scale-up) output tip diameters, respectively. For example, if conventional ultrasonic horn has an output tip diameter of 13 mm and the half-wave Barbell horn with an opening operating at the same amplitude has an output tip diameter of 65 mm, the productivity-rate increase factor after the scale-up will be greater than 50.
It is important to point out that in order for an FBH, HBH or HBHO device to permit direct process scale-up, during which the ultrasonic amplitude and other parameters are maintained while the liquid processing capacity is increased, it is necessary to make sure that the power to be delivered to the working liquid is made available by the processor’s generator and transducer. For example, a CH with an output tip diameter of 13 mm, operating at the amplitude of 90 microns in water at atmospheric pressure and 25 deg.C outputs approximately 80 W of ultrasonic power. An FBH with a 35 mm output tip diameter operating at the same amplitude will draw approximately 580 W. An FBH with a 65 mm output tip diameter will draw approximately 2,000 W. These power values are approximately doubled for HBH devices and more than doubled for HBHO devices.